English
简体中文
繁體中文
日本語
한국어
Bahasa Melayu
Bahasa Indonesia
Filipino
ไทย
Tiếng Việt
हिन्दी
العربية
Italiano
Português
Русский
Español
Français- Best Forex BrokersRaw spreads, ECN execution and regulation — tested on live accounts.Best Stock BrokersCommissions, market access and platform depth, compared.Best Prop FirmsFunding rules, drawdown limits and real payout records.Best Crypto BrokersFees, custody and coin coverage across the major exchanges.AFM Top Pick
Every other site ranks ten brokers. We rank one — and show you exactly why.
See the #1 pick → - Articles
- Events
- Newsletter
Singapore
Cambodia
Myanmar
Brunei
Australia 
New Zealand
Switzerland
UAE
United States
Mexico
Argentina
South Africa
IC Markets
Pepperstone
AvaTrade
XM
Plus500
RoboForex
TMGM
Exness
JustMarkets
Interactive Brokers
Saxo
Tiger Brokers
Orbex
Binance
Coinbase
Gemini Exchange
Kraken
iFunds
TopStep
IQ Option
Pocket Option
RaceOption
IQCent
Asia Forex Mentor · Prop Firm Reviews
AFM's Trusted Prop Trading Firms.
Every prop firm on this page has been independently reviewed by the AFM team — tested for payout reliability, challenge rule fairness, profit split structure, and scaling plan clarity. If a firm doesn’t have a verified payout record, it doesn’t appear here.
How we review prop firms →
Trustpilot
4.2 / 5
1,200+ verified reviews
🏅
Preferred by Traders
TOP 3 AFM-RECOMMENDED PROP FIRMS
Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Prop Firms and CFDs carries the potential for gains, but statistically, only 11-25% of traders actually profit, while 74-89% end up losing their investment. Be aware of these risks before investing.
Top 3 AFM-Recommended Prop Firms
The Prop Firms We Actually Recommend
Profit splits, drawdown rules and evaluation fees checked against each firm's own current programme terms, September 2026.
Risk Warning: Prop firm evaluations are paid challenges with strict rules, and most participants do not pass. Evaluation fees are generally non-refundable unless the firm's own refund terms say otherwise. Trade only with money you can afford to lose.
9.2AFM ScoreFTMO
Two-step evaluation · Est. 2015 · Prague
- Profit Split80% base · up to 90% scaled
- Max AllocationUp to $2,000,000 scaled
- Evaluation FeeFrom €79 ($10k account)
- Max Drawdown10% overall · 5% daily
"The most established name in prop trading and the one with the longest verifiable payout record — strict rules, but you always know exactly what they are."
8.7AFM ScoreThe 5%ers
Challenge evaluation · Est. 2016 · Israel
- Profit SplitUp to 100% on higher tiers
- Max AllocationUp to $4,000,000 scaled
- ModelChallenge only — 1, 2 or 3-step
- Daily Drawdown3%–5% by programme
"The most generous scaling ladder of the major firms, and the only one where a disciplined trader can reach a 100% split — read the per-programme drawdown rules before you pick one."
8.4AFM ScoreIC Funded
Backed by IC Markets · Est. 2022
- Profit Split75% rising to 80%
- Max AllocationUp to $500,000
- Evaluation FeeFrom $125 ($10k account)
- EnvironmentSimulated MT5 / cTrader
"Pricing and platform quality inherited from IC Markets, which shows in the fill quality — note the split starts at 75% and only reaches 80% after your third payout."
- Payout Verified: All three firms above have independently verified payout track records reviewed by the AFM team. We do not recommend any prop firm until we have confirmed they have paid real traders real money. If a firm is new or has unverified payouts, it does not appear on this page.
- Payout track record independently verified
- Challenge rules reviewed for fairness
💰
📋
📈
🏦
- No verifiable payout history or only self-reported testimonials
- Rules that allow the firm to change drawdown limits after you pass the challenge
- Profit split that sounds high (90%+) but only applies to the first small allocation
- No clear process for disputes — no email, no support, no resolution timeline
- Firm founded within the last 12 months with no funded trader track record
- Challenge fees that seem suspiciously low — often a sign of financial instability
